People wanted me to continue on this, so I take the liberty of doing so.
Love indeed is a feeling to share, and not just expect something in return. A friend of mine said its true, but very difficult to follow. But my dear friend, every good thing is not achieved without struggle. We will have to bring this definition into practice. Not now, not today but every moment that we live herein.
I am not a preacher, its just an answer to the doubts raised by a few who appreciated this post. I still believe that an individual's perception towards things in life at that particular situation is correct for her/him.
But if we really have to measure the success of love then it has mostly been seen in the failure of its followers. Romeo-Juliet, Heer-Ranjha or Laila-Kais. Avoiding the risk of sounding too filmy, I come back to my point that love need not necessarily be towards or for a mortal.
Kids are the best example of selfless love. They love their Teddy bears, they love their plants and school. No this isn't materialistic love. Kids hardly know what materialism is, and hence I didn't point out to grown ups who too love their soft toys.
Aah! Did I say selfless-love. Indeed, thats what this four letter word can be well suited with: selfless- the best adjective.
When we start believing in selfless love for our God, our friends, relatives and everything in this world, will we find peace and happiness in loving. Then, will people change the statement to: LOVE is synonymous to PEACE.
Keep d faith...
Karun.
No comments:
Post a Comment